|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advancing
the understanding of ground-level ozone pollution by Tom Ryerson, Aeronomy Laboratory |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Research led by scientists at the NOAA Aeronomy Laboratory has illustrated two major factors that could be used to help guide future programs designed to clean up the air downwind of the Nation's fossil-fuel burning electric power plants: the size of the power plant, and the location of the power plant. These power plants emit about one-quarter of the total U.S.
human-made contribution of nitrogen oxides, or NOx, to the atmosphere.
NOx emissions from these plants can combine with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere and sunlight to form ozone pollution. This ozone is produced near the Earth's surface, where it is harmful to human health and damaging to forests and crops. NOAA research has shown that the amount of ozone “smog” produced in power plant plumes is strongly dependent on their size and geographic location.
NOAA aircraft used to study ozone formationThe team of researchers used a highly instrumented WP-3D research aircraft to sample the NOx-rich plumes from power plants. They measured a host of chemical species inside and outside the plumes at distances of 2 to 200 km downwind of the stacks. Careful comparison of data from various power plant plumes in the eastern and southeastern U.S. permitted researchers to separate the effects of the plume's NOx concentration from the atmospheric reactive VOC composition and concentration. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dependence on power plant location |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Heavily forested areas in the eastern U.S. are characterized by high concentrations of reactive VOCs (because certain tree species are strong emitters of reactive VOCs), so the potential to form ozone from a given NOx emission is much higher there compared to, for example, the agricultural midwest. As it happens, many of the Nation's power plants (including most of the strongest NOx sources) are located in the eastern U.S., in or near forested regions where the levels of natural VOCs are high. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dependence on power plant size
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Differences of a factor of 2 or greater in ozone formation rates, and in the amount of excess plume ozone formed per amount of NOx emitted, were consistently observed between plumes from the various plants. NOAA's research confirmed that the differences could be attributed to differences in power plant size and location. Plume ozone formation rates and yields are also dependent on many other factors, such as ambient temperature, sunlight, time of day of emission, and atmospheric dispersion of plume pollutants during transport. These factors can be difficult to control. However, the large dependence on power plant size and location can be usefully exploited in ozone control strategies based on deliberate reductions in power plant NOx emissions. Implications for air quality in the U.S. The U.S. is considering a policy to reduce ozone pollution that would require reductions in NOx emissions from power plants, whereby the overall amount of NOx emitted is decreased, but individual power plants could freely trade emission credits to minimize costs. This NOAA research suggests that emission trading strategies that value all NOx emissions equally might not be optimal with respect to air quality. There could be "good-for-air-quality" trades that result in less ozone pollution, such as trades that move NOx emissions away from high-VOC forested regions, or trades that shift emissions from smaller power plants to larger ones. However, there could also be "bad-for-air-quality" trades that actually result in more ozone pollution being produced, despite a reduction in the overall amount of NOx emitted. In addition, this new NOAA information is also important input into considerations of the location and size of planned new fossil-fuel electric power plants.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[7/16/01] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CLIMATE · OCEANS, GREAT LAKES, and COASTS · WEATHER and AIR QUALITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||